Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation: clinical aspects, management and the perspectives / Infecção pelo citomegalovírus no transplante de rim: aspectos clínicos, manejo e perspectivas

Cytomegalovirus infection is one of most frequent infectious complications after renal transplantation, and can be classified as primo-infection, when the transmission occurs through the graft, or reactivation, when the recipient is cytomegalovirus seropositive. After transplantation, cytomegalovirus can appear as an infection, when the patient presents with evidence of viral replication without symptoms or disease, which has two clinical spectra: typical viral syndrome or invasive disease, which is a less common form. Their effects can be classified as direct, while the disease is developed, or indirect, with an increase of acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction risks. Diagnosis must be made based on viremia by one of the standardized methods: antigenemia or PCR, which is more sensitive. The risk factors related to infection after transplantation are the serologic matching (positive donor and negative recipient) and anti-lymphocyte antibody drugs. One of the strategies to reduce risk of disease should be chosen for patients at high risk: preemptive treatment or universal prophylaxis. Recent clinical research has described ganciclovir resistance as an emergent problem in management of cytomegalovirus infection. Two types of mutation that cause resistance were described: UL97 (most frequent) and UL54. Today, sophisticated methods of immunologic monitoring to detect specific T-cell clones against cytomegalovirus are used in clinical practice to improve the management of high-risk patients after renal transplantation.

A infecção pelo citomegalovírus é uma das principais complicações após o transplante de rim, podendo ser classificada em primoinfecção, quando a transmissão ocorre por meio do enxerto, ou em reativação, quando o receptor é soropositivo. Do ponto de vista clínico, pode se apresentar como infecção, na ausência de sintomas, ou como doença, com dois diferentes espectros: a síndrome viral típica ou, menos comumente, a doença invasiva. Os efeitos podem ser diretos, que é o desenvolvimento da doença, ou indiretos, como aumento no risco de rejeição aguda e de disfunção crônica do enxerto. O diagnóstico deve ser feito por pesquisa de viremia por meio de um dos dois métodos padronizados: antigenemia ou PCR − sendo essa última a mais sensível. Os fatores de risco relacionados com a infecção após o transplante são o match sorológico (doador positivo e receptor negativo) e o uso de anticorpos antilinfócitos. Uma das estratégias de redução de risco de doença deve ser escolhida após o transplante nos pacientes de alto risco: tratamento preemptivo ou profilaxia. Recentemente, linhas de pesquisa clínica têm apontado a resistência ao ganciclovir como um problema emergente no manejo da infecção pelo citomegalovírus. Duas formas de mutação que causam resistência são descritas: UL97, que é a mais frequente, e a UL54. Atualmente, sofisticados métodos de monitorização imunológica, como a detecção de clones específicos de células T contra o citomegalovírus podem ser utilizados na prática clínica para o melhor manejo após o transplante renal dos pacientes de alto risco.

Simultaneous monitoring of CMV and human herpesvirus 6 infections and diseases in liver transplant patients: one-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to simultaneously monitoring cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6 active infections using nested-polymerase chain reaction and, together with clinical findings, follow the clinical status of patients undergoing liver transplant. INTRODUCTION: The human β-herpesviruses, including cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6, are ubiquitous among human populations. Active infections of human herpesvirus 6 and cytomegalovirus are common after liver transplantation, possibly induced and facilitated by allograft rejection and immunosuppressive therapy. Both viruses affect the success of the transplant procedure. METHODS: Thirty patients submitted to liver transplant at the Liver Transplant Unit, at the Gastro Center, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil, were studied prospectively from six months to one year, nested-polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6 DNA detections. Two or more consecutive positive nested-polymerase chain reaction were considered indicative of active infection. RESULTS: Active infection by cytomegalovirus was detected in 13/30 (43.3 percent) patients, median time to first cytomegalovirus detection was 29 days after transplantation (range: 0-99 days). Active infection by human herpesvirus 6 was detected in 12/30 (40 percent) patients, median time to first human herpesvirus 6 detection was 23.5 days after transplantation (range: 0-273 days). The time-related appearance of each virus was not statistically different (p = 0.49). Rejection of the transplanted liver was observed in 16.7 percent (5/30) of the patients. The present analysis showed that human herpesvirus 6 and/or cytomegalovirus active infections were frequent in liver transplant recipients at our center. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients remain free of betaherpesviruses after liver transplantation. Most patients presenting active infection with more than one virus were infected sequentially and not concurrently. Nested-polymerase chain reaction can be considered of limited value for clinically monitoring cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6.

Neuropatía por virus BK post trasplante renal diagnostico y seguimiento por PCR en tiempo real / BK virus nephropathy after renal transplantation: Diagnosis and prognosis by real time PCR

La nefropatía producida por el virus BK puede llevar a la pérdida del trasplante renal. El diagnóstico etiológico es importante debido a que la clínica no permite diferenciar entre nefropatía por virus BK y rechazo agudo, en donde los tratamientos de estas dos entidades son diametralmente opuestos. El desarrollo reciente de métodos moleculares muy sensibles y específicos como PCR y PCR en tiempo real para virus BK permiten un diagnóstico de certeza en forma rápida y cuantificar la carga viral presente. El diagnóstico de nefropatía por virus BK se realiza por inmunohistoquímica en una biopsia renal, pero dada la naturaleza multifocal de las lesiones, la sensibilidad no siempre es del 100%. Los nuevos métodos de PCR para detectar virus BK en sangre y orina contribuyen al diagnóstico de nefropatía de una manera más normatizada y menos invasiva. Más aún, la cuantificación del virus BK en sangre por PCR en tiempo real, ha demostrado ser útil en el diagnóstico y monitoreo de esta enfermedad. En este trabajo se presenta el caso de una paciente transplantada renal con nefropatía por virus BK y el desarrollo de un método de PCR en tiempo real para la detección de virus BK en sangre y orina. Esta nueva metodología confirmó el diagnóstico de nefropatía por virus BK lo que permitió un cambio en el esquema de inmunosupresión y la instauración de un tratamiento que pudo ser monitorizado utilizando la carga viral.

BK virus nephropathy may lead to kidney transplant failure. BK infection and acute rejection are clinically undistinguishable, therefore diagnosis of these entities is critical to establish the correct treatment. The new molecular methods using PCR and real time PCR have significantly contributed to the rapid and sensitive diagnosis of BK virus. Furthermore, viral load determination in plasma has significantly been associated with BK virus nephropathy. Definite diagnosis of nephropathy requires renal biopsy, although due to the multifocal nature of the disease sensitivity may be less than 100%. BK detection in blood and urine by PCR has contributed to the diagnosis of nephropathy in a more standardized and less invasive way. Recently, quantification of BK virus in plasma has been used for the diagnosis and monitoring of this disease. In the present study, we describe the validation of a real time PCR method for BK virus detection in plasma and urine and its application for diagnosis and monitoring in a renal transplant patient with nephropathy.

Histocompatibilidad, citomegalovirus y trasplante renal

Se utilizó el cultivo mixto de linfocitos (CML) para tratar de establecer la correlación entre alorreactividad, rechazo e infección por citomegalovirus (CMV) y la posible reactivación del virus in vitro. Se practicaron CML clásicos para estudiar la respuesta proliferativa y en paralelo, CML para los estudios de reactivación viral. El período de seguimineto clínico de los pacientes osciló entre tres meses y un año y durante el cual se pudo corroborar la fuerte asociación entre rechazo e infección por CMV (p=0.001). Se probaron, por aislamiento viral, 144 sobrenadantes de combinaciones de CML con resultados negativos. En general, la correlación entre CML y HLA fue pobre; si bien fue significativa para HLA-(A+B), no fue la DR. Tampoco hubo asociación entre el rechazo y los parámetros clínicos rutinarios para el seguimineto de los pacientes (BUN, creatinina, depuración de creatinina), al igual que con la clase y el número de transfusiones. El porcentaje promedio de respuesta relativa (por cientoRR) fue mayor cuando la relación con el donante era paternal que cuando era fraternal (p=0.05) y la mayoría de los episodios de infección por CMV y rechazo se presentaron en los pacientes que recibieron trasplante de origen paterno

Inmunobiología del trasplante renal: rechazo inmunológico

Este trabajo es parte de una revisión bibliográfica que nos hemos propuesto los autores, dentro del marco de nuestra línea de investigación sobre inmunobiología de la reactivación del citomegalovirus en trasplante renal. En una primera contribución revisamos la historia de los trasplantes y del complejo mayor de histocompatibilidad. En esta ocasión se hace referencia a la reacción de rechazo y a las infecciones oportunistas como los principales enemigos del trasplante de órganos y se hace énfasis en la patogénesis del rechazo, su diagnóstico y su tratamiento